above zero sum models -what if people not machines sustain www

online library of norman macrae- any child can be a wonderful maths explorer if teaching uses empowerment rather than you are wrong standard testing

healthy (family-loving societies) exponentially generate strong economies not vice versa- would the 2 generations (of old and new millennium )  responsible for human sustainability understand that just in time? 2025 Report: by 1975 it was known that versus 1946, 4000 times more investment on worldwide learning tech would exponentially determine human sustainability by 2025- americas 3rd century to spin neurosis by tv ads and disgraceful political chicanery of macroeconomics trapped international reserve currency zero-sum games 2016Q! update MITKIEHL blog with Beck (Israel and meme economics -hubbed out of san diego;sports and mackey conscious business hubbed out of texas and baltimore -see also wolfram ; and ... - Sustaining human livelihoods would depend on: poorest female chinese youth uniting all millennials in sustainability goals action networks; whether elders invested in changing professions and public servants to 10 times bigger economy of open learning instead of nonrenewable consumption of things 2026Q1 update on Families as Main Agency of Development - harrison owen asks chinese under30s to redefine sustainability as youth's most productive decade' vatican and chinese worldwide community club -unite the "my family" has a dream heroes of every culture; hack the worlds' most purposeful bottom-up broadband and action nets :why does america rely on one individual to open source every -12 curricula- compare china report from mit's future of learning- or missing curricula found on mandela extranet - literacies of empowerment coding finance and entrepreneurship - teachers of 7th grade -or nairobi where IHUB not homework is every teenagers preferred evening

if you read the biography of von neumann you will be ready to brainstorm the reasons why americans, when isolated from worldwide cultures, became the late 20th century's worst teachers of exponential maths. Reasons such as

• conscious empowerment and maths purpose is to design systems logical enough for next generation to innovate what past generations could not - eg see einstein's finding whenever male dominated scientists say they have discovered everything their science is capable of , next innovations will come from modelling that science at a more micro level oi system interactions (such as amma university partners on nanotechnolguies end to poverty)

• governments are the worst employers of maths research becauee next generation isn't a voter of government
• the greatest risk to the world's sustainability is the economists who does not understand transparency of maths exponentials - read all of keynes, neumann and einstein 
• the idea that 2030 versus 1946 would spend 4000 times more on borderless communications technolgoies is very frightening to any mathematicians who analyses how all the biggest professions make the most money from externalsiation across borders and other ways of fooling themselves that the borders wont be where the biggest risks to suatainability are- understand the case of andersen if you want to explore this crisis whole truth

But that a whole generation of elders can behave so uneconomically is also why i believe we should make both an 11 plus and and 18 plus out of the 2 neumann's 2 obescenely interesting subjects:

1 compiuters - he as the father of open source computing knwoledge

2 above zero sum games

here is an example of 2- you want to live in a clean-green nation; you neighbour continues to short-trem profit by not joining you in investing in clean; eventually you nation loses jobs , sinks into debt is taken over by your dirty neighbour

among people who have debated 18 plus principles of neumann's above zero sum games - the most important one to the net generation is

• when something that historicly could only be a zero-sum game (like owning a physical property) becomes a smaller part of a world where more abundance is possible -one of two opposite things happen-if everyone at same time agrees to move over to above zero sum abundance thats what eveyone enjoys- but if one biggest player says we are sticking to zero-sum, what everyone will get is less than zero-sum

at 11 plus, the most important thing is to value communal trust so transparently that a child entering adolescence has unlimited to opportunities to practice hi-trust activities

in various practical contexts (banking energy education health to name but 4, this challenge is with us everywehre as the first net generation is becoming more interdependent than independent- as the knowledge economny could be 10 times larger than the scarcity economy of owning things

john's obscene interests are now the ones we need all our children to know about if they are to be sustainable -otherwise george orwell's big brother endgame is what we will be trapping all future generations in

--------------------------------

one way to host avove-zero sum game  - faciliate a dialogue on what purpose would each of these 7 maqrkets need to serve through every global village of a networking world to help every huan being be productively haappy and free as chartered by the founding entrepreneurial visions of the 4th quarter of 18th century in us's indepenence and france's liberte egalitefraternity/sorority

i think most of us who live in wetern democracies know somthing's not right -public servants have turned into command and control soundbiters. This has been a side-effect of tv ads. It is why we argued in 1984 that the internet was the last chnace to desig a smartening up and colabirative media rather than an addicting and divide-and-conquer media. Those used to bullying with mas media- eg the murdoch tyep tabloid have made the very worst uses of mobile media while those whsoe lives were traopped through lcak of communications like bangladeshi mothers have shwn 10 tuimes more economic ways to babk and to mobilise. It is likely the end game will be lost to big brothers through education, if we cant find a way to let girl empowerment chnage education. The economics that communities need to be sustainable is the other way round too for clean energy, healthcare and the very rules of the road that professions claim semi-monopolies to adjudicate. But the global professions that have lost hipocratic aothes in chasing the ricest and giggest customers are at the core of inconeveneinet truth as gandhi himself found in s.africa in 1906 to be the crisis with his own profession- barrister, bar of london