..


would i be correct in thinking that a self driving car needs both gpu and a cpu - latter as a central decision needed to drive even as gpu sees whats next
Yes, you’re correct that a self-driving car typically requires both a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) and a CPU (Central Processing Unit), as they serve complementary roles in enabling autonomous driving. Let me break it down concisely and tie it to the context of AI supercomputing, NVIDIA’s platforms, and the regions we’ve discussed (e.g., Japan, Taiwan, India), while addressing how this fits with agentic AI and connectivity needs like Starlink.
Why Both GPU and CPU in Self-Driving Cars?
  1. GPU Role:
    • Function: GPUs excel at parallel processing, making them ideal for real-time perception tasks in autonomous vehicles (AVs). They handle the heavy computational load of processing sensor data (e.g., cameras, LIDAR, radar) for tasks like:
      • Computer Vision: Detecting objects (cars, pedestrians, signs) using deep neural networks (DNNs) like convolutional neural networks (CNNs).
      • Sensor Fusion: Combining data from multiple sensors to create a 3D environment map.
      • Path Prediction: Anticipating the movement of nearby objects.
    • NVIDIA Example: NVIDIA’s DRIVE AGX platform (e.g., Orin, Thor) uses GPUs (Ampere or Blackwell architecture) to process up to 2,000 TOPS (tera-operations per second) for perception and mapping, critical for “seeing what’s next” in real-time.
  2. CPU Role:
    • Function: CPUs handle sequential, logic-based tasks that require centralized decision-making, such as:
      • Path Planning: Calculating the optimal driving route based on sensor data and maps.
      • Decision-Making: Making high-level choices (e.g., stop at a red light, merge into traffic) using rule-based algorithms or reinforcement learning.
      • Control Systems: Sending commands to the vehicle’s actuators (steering, throttle, brakes).
    • NVIDIA Example: DRIVE AGX includes Arm-based CPUs (e.g., Grace CPU Superchip) alongside GPUs, ensuring robust decision-making and control. The CPU integrates data from the GPU’s perception outputs to execute safe driving maneuvers.
  3. Why Both?:
    • Complementary Strengths: GPUs process massive parallel data (e.g., image recognition at 30 FPS) with low latency, while CPUs manage sequential logic and safety-critical decisions. For example, a GPU might detect a pedestrian, but the CPU decides whether to brake or swerve based on traffic rules and safety protocols.
    • Safety and Redundancy: Autonomous driving (Level 4/5) requires redundancy (e.g., NVIDIA’s Halos safety framework). CPUs often run backup systems or verify GPU outputs to meet ISO 26262 ASIL-D safety standards.
    • Edge AI: Self-driving cars rely on edge computing to minimize latency, using GPUs for inference (e.g., running DeepSeek or Mistral for perception) and CPUs for planning, all on-board to reduce dependence on cloud connectivity.
Alignment with AI Supercomputing and Regions
Connection to AI Supercomputing:
  • Japan (SoftBank): SoftBank’s Blackwell-powered DGX SuperPOD supports AV development, training models like DeepSeek or Mistral on NVIDIA’s DRIVE Sim (Omniverse-based) for simulation. These models are deployed on DRIVE AGX (GPU+CPU) for edge inference in Japan’s autonomous e-buses (NEDO’s Expo 2025 exhibit). SoftBank’s AI-RAN (5G-AI) and Starlink integration ensure low-latency data transfer for rural testing.
  • Taiwan (Taipei-1): Taipei-1’s 10,000 Blackwell GPUs train AV models, with Lepton AI marketplace distributing them to edge devices. Taiwan’s robotics focus supports NVIDIA’s DRIVE for industrial automation, potentially showcased at NEDO’s World Robot Summit.
  • India (Reliance, Mumbai): Reliance’s supercomputer trains vernacular AI models (NeMo) and AV perception models (Clara for sensor fusion), deployed on edge devices with DRIVE AGX. Jio’s low-cost 5G and Starlink’s rural coverage enable testing in India’s diverse terrains.
  • U.S. (Frontier, Aurora): These supercomputers train AV models for NVIDIA’s DRIVE Cosmos, using GPUs for simulation and CPUs for validation. Starlink supports rural testing.
  • Europe (JEDI, Alps): EuroHPC trains AV models with GDPR-compliant data, using DRIVE Sim and Starlink for rural connectivity.
  • Saudi Arabia (Humain): Emerging AV focus for smart cities, leveraging DRIVE AGX and Starlink.
NEDO’s Expo 2025 Connection:
  • Autonomous E-Buses: NEDO’s Level 4 autonomous, wireless-charging e-buses (Kansai Electric Power, Osaka Metro) likely use NVIDIA’s DRIVE AGX, combining GPUs for perception (e.g., detecting obstacles) and CPUs for navigation and control. This aligns with SoftBank’s AV efforts and Japan’s AI supercomputing push.
  • World Robot Summit: Robotics demos could leverage DRIVE Sim for training, using open models like DeepSeek Yes, you’re correct that a self-driving car requires both a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) and a CPU (Central Processing Unit), as they serve complementary roles in enabling autonomous driving. The GPU handles the heavy computational load for perception and data processing, while the CPU manages central decision-making and control logic. Below, I’ll explain their roles, how they fit into the context of self-driving cars (e.g., NVIDIA’s DRIVE platform), and connect this to the AI supercomputing, edge AI, and biotech discussions we’ve had, particularly for Japan (NEDO, SoftBank) and other regions.
1. Roles of GPU and CPU in Self-Driving Cars
GPU (Graphics Processing Unit):
  • Function: GPUs excel at parallel processing, making them ideal for handling the massive data streams from sensors (cameras, LIDAR, radar) in real-time. They power the “perception” layer of autonomous vehicles (AVs), which involves:
    • Computer Vision: Processing images/videos to detect objects (e.g., pedestrians, vehicles, signs) using deep neural networks (DNNs).
    • Sensor Fusion: Integrating data from multiple sensors to create a 3D environmental model.
    • Path Prediction: Anticipating the movement of objects (e.g., other cars) using AI models.
  • NVIDIA’s Role: NVIDIA’s DRIVE platform uses GPUs (e.g., H100, Blackwell) in DGX systems for training DNNs and DRIVE AGX (e.g., Orin, Thor) for in-vehicle inference. For example, DRIVE Orin delivers 254 TOPS (Tera Operations Per Second) for real-time perception.
  • Example: A GPU processes camera feeds to identify a pedestrian crossing the road, enabling the car to “see” what’s next.
CPU (Central Processing Unit):
  • Function: CPUs handle sequential processing and decision-making, acting as the “brain” for:
    • Path Planning: Computing optimal driving routes based on perception data (e.g., avoiding obstacles).
    • Control Logic: Executing decisions (e.g., braking, steering, accelerating) by sending commands to the vehicle’s actuators.
    • Safety and Redundancy: Running safety-critical algorithms and fallback systems to ensure reliability.
  • NVIDIA’s Role: NVIDIA’s DRIVE AGX platforms (e.g., Orin, Thor) integrate high-performance CPUs (e.g., Arm-based Grace CPU Superchip) alongside GPUs for centralized decision-making. The CPU ensures precise control while the GPU handles data-intensive tasks.
  • Example: After the GPU detects a pedestrian, the CPU decides to slow down or stop, coordinating with the vehicle’s control systems.
Why Both Are Needed:
  • Complementary Strengths: GPUs process vast sensor data in parallel (e.g., 10 cameras at 60 FPS), while CPUs make sequential, logical decisions based on that data. For instance, a GPU might identify a traffic light as red, but the CPU decides to stop the car and plans the timing.
  • Real-Time Requirements: AVs need low-latency processing (<100 ms) for safety. GPUs handle perception in milliseconds, while CPUs execute decisions in microseconds.
  • Redundancy: Level 4/5 autonomy requires fault-tolerant systems. CPUs often run redundant safety checks, while GPUs focus on AI inference.
NVIDIA DRIVE Example: NVIDIA’s DRIVE Hyperion platform combines GPUs and CPUs in a single SoC (System on Chip), like DRIVE Orin, which includes 12 Cortex-A78 CPUs and a GPU delivering 254 TOPS. This powers perception, planning, and control, with tools like DRIVE Sim (using Omniverse) for simulation and Cosmos for synthetic data generation.
2. Connection to AI Supercomputing and Regions
The GPU-CPU synergy in self-driving cars aligns with the AI supercomputing ecosystems we discussed (Taiwan, Japan, India, etc.), particularly for agentic AI, edge computing, and biotech applications showcased at NEDO’s Expo 2025.
Japan (SoftBank, AIST, NEDO):
  • Relevance: SoftBank’s Blackwell-powered DGX SuperPOD (Osaka) and AIST’s ABCI 3.0 (H200 GPUs) support AV development, leveraging NVIDIA’s DRIVE platform. NEDO’s autonomous e-bus exhibit at Expo 2025 uses wireless-charging and Level 4 autonomy, likely powered by GPU-CPU systems (e.g., DRIVE Orin).
  • AI Models: Open models like DeepSeek or Mistral could run on edge servers in e-buses, with GPUs handling perception (e.g., detecting obstacles) and CPUs managing navigation. SoftBank’s AI-RAN (5G-AI) ensures low-latency connectivity, potentially with Starlink for rural routes.
  • Biotech Link: NEDO’s bio-manufacturing (e.g., cultured meat) and robotics exhibits could use similar GPU-CPU architectures for real-time data processing, aligning with Clara for medical training simulations.
Taiwan (Taipei-1, NCHC):
  • Relevance: Taipei-1’s 10,000 Blackwell GPUs support robotics and healthcare, including AV applications. The Lepton AI marketplace could distribute DRIVE-based models for Taiwanese AV startups.
  • AI Models: DeepSeek’s efficient MoE architecture suits edge devices in AVs, with GPUs for perception and CPUs for control. Starlink ensures rural connectivity for testing AVs in Taiwan’s less urban areas.
  • Biotech Link: Taipei-1’s Clara focus supports medical training digital twins, using GPU-CPU systems akin to AVs for real-time simulations.
India (Reliance, Mumbai):
  • Relevance: Reliance’s NVIDIA-powered supercomputer supports robotics (e.g., Ati Motors’ Sherpa robots), using DRIVE for autonomy. Jio’s low-cost 5G and Starlink’s rural coverage enable AV deployment in urban and rural India.
  • AI Models: DeepSeek or Mistral on edge devices (e.g., DRIVE AGX) handle AV perception and control, with Jio-Starlink ensuring low-latency data transfer.
  • Biotech Link: Clara-based medical training (e.g., AIIMS Mumbai digital twins) uses GPU-CPU systems, mirroring AV architectures for diagnostics simulations.
U.S., Europe, Saudi Arabia:
  • U.S.: Frontier and Aurora supercomputers train AV models (e.g., DRIVE Cosmos), with GPU-CPU systems deployed in vehicles. Starlink-T-Mobile supports rural testing.
  • Europe: JEDI and Alps focus on sustainable transport, aligning with NEDO’s e-bus exhibit. GPU-CPU systems power Level 4 autonomy.
  • Saudi Arabia: Humain’s 18,000 Blackwell GPUs could develop AVs for smart cities, using DRIVE and Starlink for connectivity.
NEDO’s Expo 2025 Connection:
  • Autonomous E-Buses: NEDO’s Level 4 e-bus demo (Kansai Electric, Osaka Metro) likely uses NVIDIA DRIVE, with GPUs for perception (e.g., detecting pedestrians) and CPUs for navigation. This mirrors SoftBank’s AV focus and could integrate open models like DeepSeek for edge inference.
  • Robotics (World Robot Summit): GPU-CPU systems power human-robot collaboration, potentially using SoftBank’s AI marketplace or AIST’s ABCI 3.0 for training.
  • Biotech: The cultured meat exhibit (Osaka University) could leverage Clara on GPU-CPU edge devices, similar to AV systems, for bio-printing simulations.
3. Agentic AI and Edge Computing
Agentic AI in AVs: Self-driving cars embody agentic AI, autonomously pursuing goals (e.g., safe navigation) using GPU-CPU systems. Open models like DeepSeek or Mistral are ideal for edge inference in AVs due to:
  • Efficiency: DeepSeek’s MoE architecture (e.g., Janus-Pro-7B) uses minimal resources, running on DRIVE AGX’s GPU-CPU setup for perception and control.
  • Low Latency: Edge processing (<1 ms inference) ensures real-time decisions, critical for safety.
  • Affordability: DeepSeek’s low-cost training ($6M vs. $80M-$100M for GPT-4) and inference make it viable for community AV deployments.
Starlink’s Role: Starlink’s <20 ms latency (Version 3, 2026) supports rural AV testing and data sharing, enabling:
  • Model Updates: Downloading DeepSeek models (~5-10 GB) to AV edge devices.
  • Collaborative Learning: Sharing AV data (e.g., traffic patterns) with supercomputers like SoftBank’s DGX or Taipei-1.
  • Biotech Integration: Rural clinics access Clara-based medical training via Starlink, using GPU-CPU systems similar to AVs.
4. Biotech and Medical Training Applications
The GPU-CPU architecture in AVs extends to biotech and medical training, aligning with NEDO’s Expo 2025 exhibits:
  • Medical Training: Digital twins of medical colleges (e.g., Osaka University) use Clara on GPU-CPU systems for real-time diagnostics simulations, mirroring AV perception (GPU) and decision-making (CPU). DeepSeek supports agentic tutoring on edge devices.
  • Bio-Innovation: NEDO’s cultured meat and CO2-based biomaterials require GPU-driven AI (e.g., Clara for bio-printing optimization) and CPU-managed control systems, similar to AVs.
  • Connectivity: Starlink ensures rural Japanese schools and clinics access these AI models, complementing SoftBank’s AI-RAN and Jio’s 5G in India.
5. Supporting NEDO and Japan Embassy Friends
Recommendations for NEDO:
  • Highlight GPU-CPU Synergy: Showcase how NEDO’s e-bus and robotics exhibits use NVIDIA DRIVE’s GPU-CPU architecture, linking to SoftBank’s DGX SuperPOD for training.
  • Integrate Open Models: Collaborate with Sakana AI or AIST to deploy DeepSeek/Mistral for edge AI in robotics and bio-manufacturing demos, emphasizing affordability.
  • Leverage Starlink: Use Starlink to connect rural Japan to Expo technologies, ensuring low-latency access to AV and biotech AI models.
  • Biotech Alignment: Extend the cultured meat exhibit to medical training, using Clara and DeepSeek on GPU-CPU edge devices, showcased at the Moonshot R&D program.
  • Global Collaboration: Partner with Taiwan (Taipei-1), India (Reliance), and U.S. (CANDLE) to share biotech and AV datasets, aligning with NEDO’s startup expo.
6. Student Guidance
  • Skills: Learn NVIDIA DRIVE, Clara, and DeepSeek for GPU-CPU programming. Study Starlink APIs for connectivity.
  • Resources: NVIDIA DLI (nvidia.com/dli), Hugging Face for DeepSeek, NEDO Expo website (expo2025.or.jp).
  • Actions: Build a DeepSeek-based AV perception model or biotech simulator, showcase at Expo 2025’s Robot Week or Startup Expo.
  • Networking: Engage with SoftBank, Sakana AI, or Osaka University at Expo events.
Conclusion
  • GPU and CPU in AVs: Your understanding is correct—GPUs handle perception (e.g., seeing obstacles), while CPUs manage decisions (e.g., braking). NVIDIA’s DRIVE platform integrates both for self-driving cars.
  • NEDO Fit: Expo 2025’s e-bus and robotics exhibits align with SoftBank’s AV focus and AIST’s AI supercomputing, using GPU-CPU systems. Biotech (cultured meat) leverages similar architectures.
  • Global Context: Japan, Taiwan, and India lead in affordable edge AI, with Starlink enabling rural access for AVs and biotech.
  • Support for NEDO: Emphasize GPU-CPU synergy, open models, and Starlink connectivity to enhance Expo’s impact.
If you’d like a chart mapping NEDO’s exhibits to GPU-CPU applications or specific advice for your embassy friends, let me know!

Views: 4

Reply to This

WHAT's DATA SOVEREIGNTY & WHAT CAN INTELLIGENCE DO? Today engineers can help peoples of any place be comparatively best at what their place on earth offers to generate. For example beautiful island might wam to be a toursist destination but overtime it (eg Galapagos) might want to develop intergenerational friendships so its teenagers can connect goodwill around the world as well as any skills eg medical or green energy the island most urgently need. Generations ago, Singapore did something different; its 6 million person poluation saw itself as at the cross-seas of world's first superport. It also gave back to region asean encouraging celebration of every peoples cultures and arts. It has aimed to be the 21st C most intelligent isle- where education is transformed by every 2nd grade teacher being as curious about what will ai do over the next 5 years as anyone else. Taiwan, addmitedly a 20 million person island, chose 1987 to become world number 1 as chip design changed to maximise customer requirements instead of the moores law era where at most one new chip a year would be designed in line with Intel's 3 decades of promising 100 times more capacity every decade.

In 2025, the vibrant aAInations index is one way of looking at where is place being led to maximise its peoples intelligence opportunities for evryone to win-win (network entreprenurially)

Happy 2025- free offer first quarter of 2025 - ask us any positive question about von neumann's purpose of intelligence/brainworking - by April we hope there will be a smart agent of neumann! - chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

Maths-Lab-Crisis.docx

Joun in perplexity chats 

Does AI have name for terrifying ignorance rsks eg Los Angeles failed insurance sharing

In these days of LLM modeling, is there one integral one for multilateral systems reponsibilities

Is Ethiopia's new secirity model an Africawide benchmark

can you hlep map womens deepest  intel nets

what can you tell us about ...


thanks to JvN

2025report.com aims to celebrate first 75 years that followers of Adam Smith , Commonwealth begun by Queen Victoria, James Wilson and dozens of Royal Societies, Keynes saw from being briefed 1951 by NET (Neumann Einstein Turing). Please contacts us if you have a positive contribution - we will log these at www.economistdiary.com/1976 www.economistdiary.com/2001 and www.economistdiary.com/2023 (admittedly a preview!!)

First a summary of what the NET asked to be meidiated to integrate trust during what they foresaw as a chaotic period.

Roughly they foresaw population growth quadrupling from 2 billion to 8 billion

They were most concerned that some people would access million times moore tech by 1995 another million times moore by 2015 another million times moore by 2025. Would those with such access unite good for all. If we go back to 1760s first decade that scots invented engines around Glash=gow University James Wat and diarist Adam Smith we can note this happened just over a quarter of millennium into age of empire. WE welcome corrections be this age appears to have been a hectic race between Portugal, Spain, France Britain Netherlands as probbly the first 5 to set the system pattern. I still dont understand was it ineviatble when say the Porttuguese king bet his nations shirt on navigation that this would involve agressive trades with guns forcing the terms of trade and colonisation often being a 2nd step and then a 3rd steb being taking slaves to do the work of building on a newly conquered land. I put this way because the NET were clear almost every place in 1951 needed to complete both independence and then interdependence of above zero sum trading games. Whils traidning things runs into zero sums (eg when there is overall scarcity) life critical knowhow or apps can multiplu=y value in use. Thats was a defining value in meidting how the neyt's new engineering was mapped. Of course this problem was from 1945 occuring in a world where war had typiclly done of the following to your place:

your capital cities had been flattened by bombing - necessitating architecture rebuild as well as perhaps an all chnage in land ownership

your peoples had gone through up to 6 years of barbaric occupation -how would this be mediated (public served) particularly if you were a nation moving from radio to television

yiu mifgt eb britain have been on winning side but if huge debt to arms you had bought

primarily you might be usa now expected by most outside USSR to lead every advance'

in population terms you might be inland rural (more than half of humans) where you had much the least knowledge on what had hapened because you had been left out of the era of connecting electricity and communications grids

The NETts overall summary : beware experts in energy will be the most hated but wanted by national leaders; and then far greater will be exponential risk is the most brilliant of connectors of our new engines will become even more hated and wanted. We should remember that the NET did not begin with lets design computers. They began with Einstein's 1905 publications; newtonian science is at the deepest limits systemically wrong for living with nature's rules.

WE can thrash through more understanding of how the NET mapped the challenges from 1951 at http://neumann.ning.com/ Unfortunatnely nobody knew that within 6 years of going massively public in 1951 with their new engineering visions, all of the net would be dead. One of the most amzaing documents I have ever seen is the last month's diary of von neumann roughly October 1955 before he became bedridden with cancer. All over usa engineering projects were receiving his last genius inputs. And yet more amazing for those interested in intelligence machines is his last curriculum the computer and the brain scribbled from his bedroom in bethesda and presented posthumously by his 2nd wife Klara at Yale 1957 before she took her own life about a year later. A great loss because while neumann had architected computers she had arguably been the chief coder. Just to be clear Turing also left behind a chief coder Jane who continued to work for Britain's defence planning at cheltenham for a couple of decades. Economistwomen.com  I like to believe that the founders of brainworking machines foresaw not only that women coders would be as produytive as men but that they would linking sustainability from bottom up of every community. At least that is a valid way of looking at how primarily 1billion asian women batted the systemic poverty of being disconnected from the outside world even as coastal places leapt ahead with in some cases (G Silicon Valley, whatever you call Japan-Korea south-Taiwan-HK-Singapore access to all of 10**18 times moore

Epoch changing Guides

1 AI Training AI Training.docx

 2 Exploring cultural weaknesss of encounters with greatest brain tool.docx

.2016-23.pptx

help assemble 100000 millennials summitfuture.com and GAMES of  worldrecordjobs.com card pack 1 i lets leap froward from cop26 glasgow nov 2021 - 260th year of machines and humans started up by smith and watt- chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk-

WE APPROACH 65th year of  Neumann's tech legacy - 100 times more tech decade - which some people call Industrial Rev 4 or Arttificial Intel blending with humans; co-author 2025report.com, networker foundation of The Economist's Norman Macrae -

my father The Economist's norman macrae was privileged to meet von neumann- his legacy of 100 times more tech per decade informed much of dad's dialogues with world leaders at The Economist - in active retirement dad's first project to be von neumanns official biographer - english edition ; recently published japanese edition - queries welcomed; in 1984 i co-authored 2025report.com - this was celebrating 12 th year that dad( from 1972, also year silicon valley was born) argued for entrepreneurial revolution (ie humanity to be sustainable would need to value on sme networks not big corporate nor big gov); final edition of 2025report is being updated - 1984's timelines foresaw need to prep for fall of brlin wall within a few months; purspoes of the 5 primary sdg markets were seen to be pivotal as they blended real and digital - ie efinance e-agri e-health e-learning and 100%lives matter community; the report charged public broadcasters starting with BBC with most vital challenge- by year 2000 ensure billions of people were debating man's biggest risk as discrepancy in incomes and expectations of rich & poor nations; mediated at the right time everyone could linkin ideas as first main use of digital webs--- the failure to do this has led to fake media, failures to encourage younger half of the world to maxinise borderless friendships and sdg collabs - see eg economistwomen.com abedmooc.com teachforsdgs.com ecop26.com as 2020s becomes last chance for youth to be teh sustainability generation


 

© 2025   Created by chris macrae.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service