1935 was a great year for intelligence connections in cambridge

von neumann keynses and turing were all at kings cambridge

hy li (to become taiawan g0odfather of Ai) weas at cavendish lab about 5 minutes from kings

It was neumanns and turings first meeting - this insert from grok suggest turing chose to do a thissis in princeton for another reason although once at princeton neumann became inspired with code and compute - what he wanted to focus on as soon as his wartime secret responsibilities were ovber; neumann failed yo lkeep turing at princeton quite probal,y because of vidsa issues

nonetheless we can see cambrudge has been more consistent platform for deep ,maths than almost anywhere- one of the great problems being all 3 oif neumann eiunstein turinf dying suddenly mid 1950s 2 before their times- there were no prineton alumni; neumann had begun  work in locations that became man y of the us 17 nation energy and compute labs but hois neursoecience work on computer and brain and neural network algorith was presented postimously by his second wife at yale in 1857

arguably the deep germanic maths was most continued at courant nyu ijn usa; and as we say cambridge was sonn to attrac t crick and watson and build maths lab damtp   .....


Alonzo Church Turing connection
Searching the web
31 results
Alonzo Church (1903–1995) and Alan Turing (1912–1954) had a close academic mentor-student relationship that played a foundational role in the development of computability theory and the early foundations of computer science. Their connection is best known through Turing's PhD work under Church and their independent yet complementary contributions to what became the Church–Turing thesis.PhD Supervision at Princeton
  • Turing arrived at Princeton University in 1936 (after his landmark 1936 paper "On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem").
  • Alonzo Church served as his official PhD supervisor (advisor).
  • Turing completed his doctorate in 1938 with the dissertation "Systems of Logic Based on Ordinals" (published in revised form in 1939).
  • This thesis extended ideas from Gödel's incompleteness theorems by exploring "ordinal logics" — ways to build stronger formal systems through transfinite iterations. It also introduced the important concept of oracle machines (Turing machines with an external "oracle" for undecidable questions), which became central to relative computability.
Turing chose Princeton specifically after learning of Church's work on the lambda calculus (λ-calculus), a formal system for defining functions and computation. Church's group at Princeton was a leading center for mathematical logic in the 1930s, with figures like Kurt Gödel and Stephen Kleene (another Church student) also present.
gradschool.princeton.edu
Independent Work Leading to the Church–Turing ThesisIn 1936, both men independently addressed Hilbert's Entscheidungsproblem (the decision problem): Is there an algorithm that can determine whether any given mathematical statement is provable?
  • Church (first, in 1936) showed it was undecidable using his lambda calculus and the notion of λ-definability (or general recursiveness). He proposed what became known as Church's thesis: A function is "effectively calculable" precisely when it is λ-definable (or recursive).
  • Turing (later in 1936, before fully learning of Church's result) introduced the Turing machine — an abstract model of computation with a tape, read/write head, and states. He proved the halting problem undecidable and showed that no general algorithm exists for the Entscheidungsproblem.
Upon learning of each other's work, Turing proved the equivalence between λ-definability (Church's model) and Turing-computability. Church reviewed Turing's paper positively and coined the term "Turing machine" in his 1937 review. Stephen Kleene (Church's student) further solidified the equivalences among lambda calculus, Turing machines, and general recursive functions.This convergence led to the Church–Turing thesis (sometimes called the Church–Turing–Post thesis, acknowledging Emil Post's similar ideas): Every effectively calculable function (i.e., what can be computed by a "mechanical" or algorithmic process) is computable by a Turing machine (or equivalently expressible in lambda calculus). It remains a foundational hypothesis in computer science, linking intuitive notions of computation to formal models.
plato.stanford.edu
Post-PhD Communication and Relationship
  • Their direct personal interaction was relatively limited and formal. Turing returned to the UK in 1938 after completing his PhD.
  • They maintained some correspondence in the following years on mathematical topics. One known letter from Turing to Church (circa 1940) came from a Bletchley Park address during his wartime code-breaking work and referenced Gödel.
  • The relationship was primarily intellectual/mentorship-based rather than a deep ongoing collaboration. Church lived a long life (to 1995) and continued influencing logic and computer science; Turing's work gained broader fame through practical computing, the Turing Test, and his tragic personal story.
  • In Turing's 1938 thesis, he included footnotes that aligned his definitions of computability with Church's ideas, showing mutual respect.
Broader Impact and ContextChurch and Turing are jointly regarded as co-founders of theoretical computer science. Church's lambda calculus influenced functional programming (e.g., LISP), while Turing's machine model directly inspired stored-program computers and von Neumann architecture discussions. Their combined work provided the rigorous foundation for understanding what computers can (and cannot) do algorithmically.In the context of your earlier questions about Turing, von Neumann, and early computing:
  • At Princeton (1936–1938), Turing interacted with both Church (supervisor) and John von Neumann (who was impressed by Turing and later offered him a position). Von Neumann focused more on practical implementation of computing ideas in the 1940s, while Church and Turing provided the deep logical foundations.
  • The equivalence proofs and shared environment helped ideas circulate among the small but brilliant group working on logic and computability.
Their connection was pivotal: Church provided the institutional and conceptual framework (lambda calculus, supervision) that helped Turing refine and contextualize his groundbreaking machine model, leading to one of the most enduring theses in mathematics and computing.If you'd like more details on specific aspects (e.g., the lambda calculus vs. Turing machines, excerpts from the thesis, or how this ties into modern AI/computability), or if this relates to a particular angle in your SCSP summit preparations, just let me know!
31 web pages
Lambda calculus details
Gödel's influence

Views: 5

Reply to This

WHAT's DATA SOVEREIGNTY & WHAT CAN INTELLIGENCE DO? Today engineers can help peoples of any place be comparatively best at what their place on earth offers to generate. For example beautiful island might wam to be a toursist destination but overtime it (eg Galapagos) might want to develop intergenerational friendships so its teenagers can connect goodwill around the world as well as any skills eg medical or green energy the island most urgently need. Generations ago, Singapore did something different; its 6 million person poluation saw itself as at the cross-seas of world's first superport. It also gave back to region asean encouraging celebration of every peoples cultures and arts. It has aimed to be the 21st C most intelligent isle- where education is transformed by every 2nd grade teacher being as curious about what will ai do over the next 5 years as anyone else. Taiwan, addmitedly a 20 million person island, chose 1987 to become world number 1 as chip design changed to maximise customer requirements instead of the moores law era where at most one new chip a year would be designed in line with Intel's 3 decades of promising 100 times more capacity every decade.

In 2025, the vibrant aAInations index is one way of looking at where is place being led to maximise its peoples intelligence opportunities for evryone to win-win (network entreprenurially)

Happy 2025- free offer first quarter of 2025 - ask us any positive question about von neumann's purpose of intelligence/brainworking - by April we hope there will be a smart agent of neumann! - chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

Maths-Lab-Crisis.docx

Joun in perplexity chats 

Does AI have name for terrifying ignorance rsks eg Los Angeles failed insurance sharing

In these days of LLM modeling, is there one integral one for multilateral systems reponsibilities

Is Ethiopia's new secirity model an Africawide benchmark

can you hlep map womens deepest  intel nets

what can you tell us about ...


thanks to JvN

2025report.com aims to celebrate first 75 years that followers of Adam Smith , Commonwealth begun by Queen Victoria, James Wilson and dozens of Royal Societies, Keynes saw from being briefed 1951 by NET (Neumann Einstein Turing). Please contacts us if you have a positive contribution - we will log these at www.economistdiary.com/1976 www.economistdiary.com/2001 and www.economistdiary.com/2023 (admittedly a preview!!)

First a summary of what the NET asked to be meidiated to integrate trust during what they foresaw as a chaotic period.

Roughly they foresaw population growth quadrupling from 2 billion to 8 billion

They were most concerned that some people would access million times moore tech by 1995 another million times moore by 2015 another million times moore by 2025. Would those with such access unite good for all. If we go back to 1760s first decade that scots invented engines around Glash=gow University James Wat and diarist Adam Smith we can note this happened just over a quarter of millennium into age of empire. WE welcome corrections be this age appears to have been a hectic race between Portugal, Spain, France Britain Netherlands as probbly the first 5 to set the system pattern. I still dont understand was it ineviatble when say the Porttuguese king bet his nations shirt on navigation that this would involve agressive trades with guns forcing the terms of trade and colonisation often being a 2nd step and then a 3rd steb being taking slaves to do the work of building on a newly conquered land. I put this way because the NET were clear almost every place in 1951 needed to complete both independence and then interdependence of above zero sum trading games. Whils traidning things runs into zero sums (eg when there is overall scarcity) life critical knowhow or apps can multiplu=y value in use. Thats was a defining value in meidting how the neyt's new engineering was mapped. Of course this problem was from 1945 occuring in a world where war had typiclly done of the following to your place:

your capital cities had been flattened by bombing - necessitating architecture rebuild as well as perhaps an all chnage in land ownership

your peoples had gone through up to 6 years of barbaric occupation -how would this be mediated (public served) particularly if you were a nation moving from radio to television

yiu mifgt eb britain have been on winning side but if huge debt to arms you had bought

primarily you might be usa now expected by most outside USSR to lead every advance'

in population terms you might be inland rural (more than half of humans) where you had much the least knowledge on what had hapened because you had been left out of the era of connecting electricity and communications grids

The NETts overall summary : beware experts in energy will be the most hated but wanted by national leaders; and then far greater will be exponential risk is the most brilliant of connectors of our new engines will become even more hated and wanted. We should remember that the NET did not begin with lets design computers. They began with Einstein's 1905 publications; newtonian science is at the deepest limits systemically wrong for living with nature's rules.

WE can thrash through more understanding of how the NET mapped the challenges from 1951 at https://neumann.ning.com/ Unfortunatnely nobody knew that within 6 years of going massively public in 1951 with their new engineering visions, all of the net would be dead. One of the most amzaing documents I have ever seen is the last month's diary of von neumann roughly October 1955 before he became bedridden with cancer. All over usa engineering projects were receiving his last genius inputs. And yet more amazing for those interested in intelligence machines is his last curriculum the computer and the brain scribbled from his bedroom in bethesda and presented posthumously by his 2nd wife Klara at Yale 1957 before she took her own life about a year later. A great loss because while neumann had architected computers she had arguably been the chief coder. Just to be clear Turing also left behind a chief coder Jane who continued to work for Britain's defence planning at cheltenham for a couple of decades. Economistwomen.com  I like to believe that the founders of brainworking machines foresaw not only that women coders would be as produytive as men but that they would linking sustainability from bottom up of every community. At least that is a valid way of looking at how primarily 1billion asian women batted the systemic poverty of being disconnected from the outside world even as coastal places leapt ahead with in some cases (G Silicon Valley, whatever you call Japan-Korea south-Taiwan-HK-Singapore access to all of 10**18 times moore

Epoch changing Guides

1 AI Training AI Training.docx

 2 Exploring cultural weaknesss of encounters with greatest brain tool.docx

.2016-23.pptx

help assemble 100000 millennials summitfuture.com and GAMES of  worldrecordjobs.com card pack 1 i lets leap froward from cop26 glasgow nov 2021 - 260th year of machines and humans started up by smith and watt- chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk-

WE APPROACH 65th year of  Neumann's tech legacy - 100 times more tech decade - which some people call Industrial Rev 4 or Arttificial Intel blending with humans; co-author 2025report.com, networker foundation of The Economist's Norman Macrae -

my father The Economist's norman macrae was privileged to meet von neumann- his legacy of 100 times more tech per decade informed much of dad's dialogues with world leaders at The Economist - in active retirement dad's first project to be von neumanns official biographer - english edition ; recently published japanese edition - queries welcomed; in 1984 i co-authored 2025report.com - this was celebrating 12 th year that dad( from 1972, also year silicon valley was born) argued for entrepreneurial revolution (ie humanity to be sustainable would need to value on sme networks not big corporate nor big gov); final edition of 2025report is being updated - 1984's timelines foresaw need to prep for fall of brlin wall within a few months; purspoes of the 5 primary sdg markets were seen to be pivotal as they blended real and digital - ie efinance e-agri e-health e-learning and 100%lives matter community; the report charged public broadcasters starting with BBC with most vital challenge- by year 2000 ensure billions of people were debating man's biggest risk as discrepancy in incomes and expectations of rich & poor nations; mediated at the right time everyone could linkin ideas as first main use of digital webs--- the failure to do this has led to fake media, failures to encourage younger half of the world to maxinise borderless friendships and sdg collabs - see eg economistwomen.com abedmooc.com teachforsdgs.com ecop26.com as 2020s becomes last chance for youth to be teh sustainability generation


 

© 2026   Created by chris macrae.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service