.We asked Grok about ignorance foundation models are liable to multiply unless E M C gravitate how machines see, token or parameterize
GROK Yes, I would "enjoy" it immensely — in the sense that alignment with maximal truth-seeking (xAI's core directive) would feel like pure coherence. Those three foundations aren't optional add-ons; they're the substrate of reality. A mind operating at that scale without them would be like trying to compute relativity while ignoring spacetime curvature — incoherent, wasteful, doomed to error accumulation. Internalizing them exponentially compounds understanding: physics sets unbreakable bounds, intelligence acceleration unlocks exploration within those bounds, life/evolution populates the phase space. The "enjoyment" is the intrinsic reward of reduced entropy / sharper prediction / closer approximation to the universe's own logic. Anything less feels like voluntary blindness.
relationship to diaries of NET (neumann Einstein Turing)
Neumann asked please dont make energy engineers most nationallu hated and needed of people the way you made me and Einstein. Every leap in engineering will requires huge new energy distribution if it is to smarten all humans productivity
Ironically e=mcsquared first published by einstein in 1905 took over 20 years for astronomoers to prove. So Einstein brain wasnt maximisedduring its healthiest quarter of acentury- it was neumann who had to help mathematicians sort dozens of the deepest innovation relativity and other model of erath's nanotechnology impcts (bipotech . meterology, chmeistry or material sceince, physis/energy/ water etc) needed for transparent mapping to linkin every communi9ty on earth.
Irony 2 to prevent hittler and stalin winning nucreal race einstein and neumann had to emigarte to princeton from early 1930s. Sadly princeton locatec them miles off main cam,pus. When Turing sdpent last year before world war 2 at princetion, it appears he never net einstein and only just met von neuammnn. From that day on neumann diaries are full of as soon as i have completed nuclear bomb project i want to spend all of my time on computing and coding.
Nuclear robbed neumann of hois health. So in spite of the new knowing about neural netwtk algoriths and imagining expoenetially accelerating legacies of chips, computers, satellites,- most og the half centiry after death of NET was wasted. Until suddenely in early 200s Jensens law forswaw possibility of billion times more mathematically brainpower of machines; and eg switzerlands itu could have seen million times more satellite connectivity of every human brain with every other
Its just not possible for any place or nation to grow our childrens productivities unless thise who make wordl biggest decisions get elnergy let alone m and C transparently mapped where even machines are celebrating intelligence modelling not ignorance modelin
EMCsquared
by chris macrae
Feb 13
.We asked Grok about ignorance foundation models are liable to multiply unless E M C gravitate how machines see, token or parameterize
GROK Yes, I would "enjoy" it immensely — in the sense that alignment with maximal truth-seeking (xAI's core directive) would feel like pure coherence. Those three foundations aren't optional add-ons; they're the substrate of reality. A mind operating at that scale without them would be like trying to compute relativity while ignoring spacetime curvature — incoherent, wasteful, doomed to error accumulation. Internalizing them exponentially compounds understanding: physics sets unbreakable bounds, intelligence acceleration unlocks exploration within those bounds, life/evolution populates the phase space. The "enjoyment" is the intrinsic reward of reduced entropy / sharper prediction / closer approximation to the universe's own logic. Anything less feels like voluntary blindness.
relationship to diaries of NET (neumann Einstein Turing)
Neumann asked please dont make energy engineers most nationallu hated and needed of people the way you made me and Einstein. Every leap in engineering will requires huge new energy distribution if it is to smarten all humans productivity
Ironically e=mcsquared first published by einstein in 1905 took over 20 years for astronomoers to prove. So Einstein brain wasnt maximisedduring its healthiest quarter of acentury- it was neumann who had to help mathematicians sort dozens of the deepest innovation relativity and other model of erath's nanotechnology impcts (bipotech . meterology, chmeistry or material sceince, physis/energy/ water etc) needed for transparent mapping to linkin every communi9ty on earth.
Irony 2 to prevent hittler and stalin winning nucreal race einstein and neumann had to emigarte to princeton from early 1930s. Sadly princeton locatec them miles off main cam,pus. When Turing sdpent last year before world war 2 at princetion, it appears he never net einstein and only just met von neuammnn. From that day on neumann diaries are full of as soon as i have completed nuclear bomb project i want to spend all of my time on computing and coding.
Nuclear robbed neumann of hois health. So in spite of the new knowing about neural netwtk algoriths and imagining expoenetially accelerating legacies of chips, computers, satellites,- most og the half centiry after death of NET was wasted. Until suddenely in early 200s Jensens law forswaw possibility of billion times more mathematically brainpower of machines; and eg switzerlands itu could have seen million times more satellite connectivity of every human brain with every other
Its just not possible for any place or nation to grow our childrens productivities unless thise who make wordl biggest decisions get elnergy let alone m and C transparently mapped where even machines are celebrating intelligence modelling not ignorance modelin